Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ryan Peter John's avatar

Love

Spiros A. Lazarou, MD's avatar

Since we have referred to Constantine and Alfred as reference points for what we want to achieve and where we want to go it is important to look at them a little more closely to see if our hopes align with reality. Briefly, Constantine was in no way ambiguous regarding his faith. It informed him and was the basis, the foundation of his life and world view. He started significant infrastructure projects in Britain and dramatically increased Britons’ prosperity, he was already known for his infrastructure proclivities wherever he went. He broke up the Praetorian guard and gave them other duties, over-hauled the entire tax system making it more equitable, stopped inflation and created a stable currency and economy, stopped the persecutions of Christians, allowed complete religious freedom, returned land unjustly confiscated, sought unity within the empire calling an ecumenical council to clarify the experience of the Church to bring about reconciliation and unity based on Truth not sentiment nor the marginalization of nonChrisitans who still comprised the vast majority of the empire. He was a shrewd military tactitian, soundly defeating Maxentius at Milvian Bridge and later Licinius at Adrianople. He stopped the beating of slaves and mistreatment of those waiting for trial as well as those sentenced in general ordering they have sunlight, fresh air and a meal everyday and countless other reforms.

After St Germanos of Auxerre (4th/5th C) christianised the Britons and sent St Patrick to Christianise Ireland, Briton was ravaged by the invasion of the Angles and Saxons. St Gregory the Great, Pope of Rome sent St Augustine of Rome to Christianise them and reconcile the Anglo-Saxons with the Britons. After very great efforts the Christian faith was able to overcome animosities and unity was achieved. When Albert became king in the late 9th century he was dealing with another round of social disintegration and conquest from Danes and Vikings ravaging the island. To reunify and resurrect England he looked and stood upon the firm tradition of St Gregory the Great, without a doubt his favorite Father of the Church. In his humility and wisdom after his first great victory over the Danes one of his primary demands was they be baptised and chritianized - easier to convert the invader than remove him. What Constantine before him achieved in the whole of the Roman Empire but on a smaller scale, Alfred reunified England and introduced reforms that spiritually and materially revived his people. Crucial to the faith always is the reestablishment of monastic life. It is the monk who has no earthly obligations to family and property that is the most vocal against the inappropriate encroachment of power in life and decadence in the land besides the indispensable focus on prayer. Man is neither homosapiens, nor homofaber but rather homo ecclesiasticus.

Albert was a contemporary of St Photos the Great, patriarch of Constantinople and John VIII Pope of Rome who convened the 8th Ecumenical Council and condemned the Filioque in 880 AD. This council was subsequently rejected on specious grounds by Rome in the 11th Century after Rome fell for the last time to the Franks and Normans and following the official recognition of the schism. It is the first time a heresy is condemned without condemning the heretic(s) in this case the Franks due to the fear that these barbarians would unleash severe persecution on the subjugated western Roman Orthodox of Gaul and the other parts of the empire they had settled. Photius was an intellectual and spiritual giant. He introduced small letters to the greek alphabet, resurrected spiritual life in Byzantium after the chaos of iconoclasm, sent Cyril and Methodius to christianise the Slavs using their own language (Albert also translated holy texts in English) and much more.

The trouble for the English begins with their subjugation to the Normans after their defeat at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 after having just defeated once again the Vikings and exhausted by this multi front invasion. The entire anglosaxon aristocracy was removed and anglosaxon bishops were replaced with Norman bishops who brought their horrific pseudochristian and largely condemned innovations to england. Many escaped to Ireland as well as Constantinople. It is why later Eastern Orthodox Christians preferred to be conquered by Muslims rather than Franks and Normans as they did not replace Orthodox bishops with heretical ones. The Normans redistributed English land to themselves, built a vast system of castles as their cousins in Gaul and established their feudal extractive system. As the Gauls (Greeks alone still refer to France as Gaul) and Iberians before them they have forgotten their orthodox Christian roots after centuries of occupation. In gratitude Rome then gave Ireland to the Norman crown in England thereby further evidencing that the Papacy was no longer a Church but an extractive, parasitic state.

While it is not possible to fully understand the subsequent history of Western Europe without understanding the pseudochristianity the Franks imposed on their subjects it is equally vital to understand the significance on the west of the subsequent destruction of Byzantium by Muslims (the fall of Constantinople in 1453 is the same year that the 100 years war ended and the English were removed from Calais) and the influx this time of orthodox christians westward to the subsequent end of the feudal state and the development of elected monarchies (not democracies) in the west. The real struggle in the west will be to develop true democracies.

I had mentioned before that civilization and liberty begins with food - the Eucharist (gratitude). Do the clergy alone have the power to bring down divinity and divinise bread and wine or does the congregation have to respond affirmatively for this to happen? Am I merely eating death and that which cannot long sustain me because I am a passive observer or am I eating life and liberty because I am an active responsible participant in divine life? Are we going to self-deify or be deified by grace?

Right now there is no Alfred or Constantine in sight. We are in the middle innings of this ultimately deeply spiritual war between the Kingdom of God an the Kingdom of Mammon. The cracks are visible because lies cannot stand long. Secularization seems to be an important stage in western development as it is the throwing off of the heresies that have subjugated western christians that are at the root of the problem. As secularism reaches its nihilistic phase the sane among us will realize one cannot throw out the baby (Jesus) with the bath water...

What is described as a financial type is an idea that runs across nations and states, making it more complex and nuanced. A type can only be fought by another type, Adam or the New Adam, another idea and way of life...

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?