Good read E.M. It points to the "true North" of America's predicament today.
The core idea: after 1688, the monarchy lost independent financial autonomy, and the people who gained leverage were those who controlled credit—merchants, joint‑stock investors, and the Bank of England’s early backers.
Import and transplant this "seedling" core concept into the vast and fertile soil of American assets and resources, then water and fertilize this "type" liberally with constant applications of vast quantities of "Mr. Green" (Benjamins to the streetwise) to various gatekeepers at pivot points--and VOILA! America 2026.
Huge issue: getting Patriots and even 'fence-sitters' to WANT CHANGE FOR THE BETTER! Not slogans--it's felt in the bones and sinews. Motivation to me is key. If Family, friends, and nation aren't important--it's a lost cause.
Byzantium endured for a thousand years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire because it preserved and adapted the strongest elements of Roman statecraft while developing its own resilient political, cultural, military, and economic systems. The empire’s longevity came from a combination of institutional continuity, strategic geography, cultural cohesion, and administrative flexibility by honorable and courageous citizens.
Rx: A shared mental playbook for any situation with a bias toward positive action in a culture of discipline and initiative.
Communicate to others in a way to simplify our complex mission into repeatable, easily understandable habits. It's the formation of a new energized nation.
We ask ourselves: "What is the task, the condition, the standard, and the end result?" Educate freedom-lovers to do what must be done. under what conditions, and how well it must be done.
This keeps our tasks measurable and clear. You've opened our eyes--and your articles, like Tom Paine's pamphlets--will help shape the revolutionary thought we need and galvanize public support to rid America of this tyranny over our mind, body, soul, and property.
Can we do no less? Our debt to those who have gone before us and our duty cry out.
"Huge issue: getting Patriots and even 'fence-sitters' to WANT CHANGE FOR THE BETTER! Not slogans--it's felt in the bones and sinews. Motivation to me is key. If Family, friends, and nation aren't important--it's a lost cause."
The WANT is there. Its the lack of organization and fear of:
1) going against societal norms/being seen as crazy
2) not wanting to be blacklisted, targeted and caught in a one sided legal system
With a little more research, one can look up all the contractual obligations of the colonies to the Crown. One can reverse engineer the Constitution(debt instrument) with Article 1, section 10, the emphasis on contracts. And then Article 6 involving debts and previous contracts. The previous contracts include every colonial company charter especially the Virginia Charter which grants the King and all his successors a portion of all copper, silver, and gold found in the new colony. One can also look up the Peace Treaty of , I think , 1783, where the King of England, through his scribe, is writing the Peace Treaty. Let me repeat that. The King wrote the peace treaty. Only the winner of a war would write the peace treaty. Because, there was no war, it was a Revolt. All colonial gentry maintained their allegiance to the King, because they had to, their families come from royalty and aristocratic families who have land, money, and titles back in England. Since day one, the gentry who make up the United States (even today, why would they give up control and power) has put forth the facade that America was somehow independent of the Crown, but never were. And for more information, the King, and all his heirs and successors, are still contractually obligated to the Vatican, through contracts going back to King John. So , US contractually obligated to the Crown, and the Crown is still contractually obligated to the Holy See.
I think the distinction you draw between "Financialist type" and conspiracy is the most important sentence in this piece — and also I suspect the most underappreciated. This pattern doesn't require coordination. It requires only alignment of incentives and shared institutional formation. People educated similarly, selected by similar institutions, incentivised similarly, will naturally pursue policies that protect and expand that system. Not by agreement, although they typically will agree. But by selection. The conspiracy reading is far easier to dismiss than the structural reading, which might also be why it gets elevated.
What I'd like to add is the mechanism that explains why every proposed reform becomes the next iteration. You document it empirically — colonists replicate the Bank model, Bretton Woods relocates rather than liberates, the Dulles brothers move seamlessly between Wall Street and State. But why is this replication so reliable?
The answer is in the tenure gap. The decision-maker who embeds the extraction architecture captures the benefit immediately — in their career, their compensation, their reputation as a bold reformer. The consequences manifest a generation later, when they're gone. The next generation inherits the consequences, proposes reforms, and the same selection pressure operates on them. The architecture selects for the type that will run it. New personnel. Same architecture. Same result.
Your 1688 dateable origin is also the most useful element in the piece, though I don't think you've necessarily drawn the full implication. It means this is not eternal human nature. It is a specific architectural decision, made at a specific moment, that can be traced, named, and — in principle — reversed. But the reversal requires changing the architecture, not the personnel. Reasserting political control over the Fed installs new personnel in the same architecture. The type emerges again.
I've been working on a framework I have developed that maps exactly this — at company scale, sector scale, and the civilisational scale you're operating at here. The mechanism is the same at every level. The fractal property is the part that still astonishes me. I'd be glad to share it if you're interested.
Great piece. Thought provoking as always. This U.S. Administration is taking strong action toward breaking the Elite Fiancialist’s system, moving us closer to that contemporary version of Constantinople--which sounds like a good idea. Also, it's synchronic that more people are realizing this world is not what they've been lead to believe. Through whatever differing means of disclosure they're paying attention, this awareness helps to cripple the old system's ability to re-build itself or even maintain it's crumbling framework.
Many Thanks ! At best can we possibly get back to the American "Political Economy" ?. Does the current / future leadership have the balls to eliminate / "right size existing Fed Board & let the 12 regionals set the local rates according the actual price of $. SOFR was a good start....
Appreciate the coherence. More will be even better as I continue trying to re-educate older grandkids…one looks to becoming a financialist, one an artist, and one a historian/policy maker. All had elite New York educations so plenty of reframing to accomplish in my allotted time.
Brilliant history lesson clearly told and easily understood by all. Per book-on-tape interviewing former first lady Jacqueline Kennedy, she states: " the White House fell under Truman " in 1952. Did we fall to the financialist elite (human and nonhuman)? Was there a deal made? If so, what was it? Would you know, based on your extensive historical education, if true, are we still "down" or have we stood up and don't know it? Or are we in the process of standing up? As an aside; Personally, I believe we need to negotiate a higher price with the child/human sex traffickers and buyers to buy those children and teenagers and vulnerable people back to safety by the good guys, families and everyone who cares about the present and future which, of course, ARE THE CHILDREN! 🙏
Excellent for staging events to end the old way and start anew. The Iran mess in my mind has one soul purpose to introduce a digital ID and currency system due to some all encompassing cyber crisis ( phooey )
This is very interesting only on the American Revolution, Franklin, Washington and others were Free Masons and "British Spies". The colony side worked with the British side to work the war and it's outcome-the centralized (Federal) control we now suffer. It wasn't elite factions fighting, they were all the on the same side just like wars are now.
Thank you Francis for this excellent referral, which eloquently describes the history and trajectory of our current global (western) financial system. As the future unfolds expect more conflict and disruption because now we have a third element involved. The end of growth due to EROEI in our hydrocarbon energy system. Our rulers already know this, kicked off by the Club of Rome in 1972. The response was predictable - financialisation to keep the ball rolling. It is ending now and CBDC is not a valid answer. https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/
"Labor for all, the opening of Credit for all; Leisure for all will be our bogie for the illusory creation of a new social class: the "Middle Class". Because once our objectives are reached, the "Class" in the middle, between the secular poor, and we the rich, we will definitely remove by cutting off all means of survival."
"Thus it will be possible to sharply increase the burden of the State by multiplying without any limit a body of intellectual public servants. Insured for years in advance of material security, they will be consequently perfect for executors of "Government Authority", in other words of "Our Power".
"Thus creating an impressive body of officials who will in itself (a Government within the Government), irrespective of the political party that is in power. This anonymous machine can serve us one day means of leverages when the moment comes to accelerate the economic collapse of the Nation States, because these will not be able to indefinitely sustain such mass salaries without having going into debt beyond their means."
The Toronto Protocols of the Canadian Freemasons. 1967
Good read E.M. It points to the "true North" of America's predicament today.
The core idea: after 1688, the monarchy lost independent financial autonomy, and the people who gained leverage were those who controlled credit—merchants, joint‑stock investors, and the Bank of England’s early backers.
Import and transplant this "seedling" core concept into the vast and fertile soil of American assets and resources, then water and fertilize this "type" liberally with constant applications of vast quantities of "Mr. Green" (Benjamins to the streetwise) to various gatekeepers at pivot points--and VOILA! America 2026.
Huge issue: getting Patriots and even 'fence-sitters' to WANT CHANGE FOR THE BETTER! Not slogans--it's felt in the bones and sinews. Motivation to me is key. If Family, friends, and nation aren't important--it's a lost cause.
Byzantium endured for a thousand years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire because it preserved and adapted the strongest elements of Roman statecraft while developing its own resilient political, cultural, military, and economic systems. The empire’s longevity came from a combination of institutional continuity, strategic geography, cultural cohesion, and administrative flexibility by honorable and courageous citizens.
Rx: A shared mental playbook for any situation with a bias toward positive action in a culture of discipline and initiative.
Communicate to others in a way to simplify our complex mission into repeatable, easily understandable habits. It's the formation of a new energized nation.
We ask ourselves: "What is the task, the condition, the standard, and the end result?" Educate freedom-lovers to do what must be done. under what conditions, and how well it must be done.
This keeps our tasks measurable and clear. You've opened our eyes--and your articles, like Tom Paine's pamphlets--will help shape the revolutionary thought we need and galvanize public support to rid America of this tyranny over our mind, body, soul, and property.
Can we do no less? Our debt to those who have gone before us and our duty cry out.
lordrothbury.com
Thanks. VERY interesting!
"Huge issue: getting Patriots and even 'fence-sitters' to WANT CHANGE FOR THE BETTER! Not slogans--it's felt in the bones and sinews. Motivation to me is key. If Family, friends, and nation aren't important--it's a lost cause."
The WANT is there. Its the lack of organization and fear of:
1) going against societal norms/being seen as crazy
2) not wanting to be blacklisted, targeted and caught in a one sided legal system
With a little more research, one can look up all the contractual obligations of the colonies to the Crown. One can reverse engineer the Constitution(debt instrument) with Article 1, section 10, the emphasis on contracts. And then Article 6 involving debts and previous contracts. The previous contracts include every colonial company charter especially the Virginia Charter which grants the King and all his successors a portion of all copper, silver, and gold found in the new colony. One can also look up the Peace Treaty of , I think , 1783, where the King of England, through his scribe, is writing the Peace Treaty. Let me repeat that. The King wrote the peace treaty. Only the winner of a war would write the peace treaty. Because, there was no war, it was a Revolt. All colonial gentry maintained their allegiance to the King, because they had to, their families come from royalty and aristocratic families who have land, money, and titles back in England. Since day one, the gentry who make up the United States (even today, why would they give up control and power) has put forth the facade that America was somehow independent of the Crown, but never were. And for more information, the King, and all his heirs and successors, are still contractually obligated to the Vatican, through contracts going back to King John. So , US contractually obligated to the Crown, and the Crown is still contractually obligated to the Holy See.
I think the distinction you draw between "Financialist type" and conspiracy is the most important sentence in this piece — and also I suspect the most underappreciated. This pattern doesn't require coordination. It requires only alignment of incentives and shared institutional formation. People educated similarly, selected by similar institutions, incentivised similarly, will naturally pursue policies that protect and expand that system. Not by agreement, although they typically will agree. But by selection. The conspiracy reading is far easier to dismiss than the structural reading, which might also be why it gets elevated.
What I'd like to add is the mechanism that explains why every proposed reform becomes the next iteration. You document it empirically — colonists replicate the Bank model, Bretton Woods relocates rather than liberates, the Dulles brothers move seamlessly between Wall Street and State. But why is this replication so reliable?
The answer is in the tenure gap. The decision-maker who embeds the extraction architecture captures the benefit immediately — in their career, their compensation, their reputation as a bold reformer. The consequences manifest a generation later, when they're gone. The next generation inherits the consequences, proposes reforms, and the same selection pressure operates on them. The architecture selects for the type that will run it. New personnel. Same architecture. Same result.
Your 1688 dateable origin is also the most useful element in the piece, though I don't think you've necessarily drawn the full implication. It means this is not eternal human nature. It is a specific architectural decision, made at a specific moment, that can be traced, named, and — in principle — reversed. But the reversal requires changing the architecture, not the personnel. Reasserting political control over the Fed installs new personnel in the same architecture. The type emerges again.
I've been working on a framework I have developed that maps exactly this — at company scale, sector scale, and the civilisational scale you're operating at here. The mechanism is the same at every level. The fractal property is the part that still astonishes me. I'd be glad to share it if you're interested.
Excellent work EM.
Definitely essential to disseminate this piece widely.
Excellent, filed in my Substack Good Reads folder for future reference and study.
Great piece. Thought provoking as always. This U.S. Administration is taking strong action toward breaking the Elite Fiancialist’s system, moving us closer to that contemporary version of Constantinople--which sounds like a good idea. Also, it's synchronic that more people are realizing this world is not what they've been lead to believe. Through whatever differing means of disclosure they're paying attention, this awareness helps to cripple the old system's ability to re-build itself or even maintain it's crumbling framework.
Many Thanks ! At best can we possibly get back to the American "Political Economy" ?. Does the current / future leadership have the balls to eliminate / "right size existing Fed Board & let the 12 regionals set the local rates according the actual price of $. SOFR was a good start....
A most enlightening, edifying, and entertaining read. Greatly appreciate your writing.
Not my best writing. Will dive in over the next couple weeks in several pieces. To better clarify.
Appreciate the coherence. More will be even better as I continue trying to re-educate older grandkids…one looks to becoming a financialist, one an artist, and one a historian/policy maker. All had elite New York educations so plenty of reframing to accomplish in my allotted time.
Brilliant history lesson clearly told and easily understood by all. Per book-on-tape interviewing former first lady Jacqueline Kennedy, she states: " the White House fell under Truman " in 1952. Did we fall to the financialist elite (human and nonhuman)? Was there a deal made? If so, what was it? Would you know, based on your extensive historical education, if true, are we still "down" or have we stood up and don't know it? Or are we in the process of standing up? As an aside; Personally, I believe we need to negotiate a higher price with the child/human sex traffickers and buyers to buy those children and teenagers and vulnerable people back to safety by the good guys, families and everyone who cares about the present and future which, of course, ARE THE CHILDREN! 🙏
Ultimately, slavers are only stopped when they’re impoverished and killed.
Please see this:
https://montanarcc.substack.com/p/why-we-need-ubi
Partial truths here. It's actually the Anglo-American-Zionist Empire. Who pokes his finger in King Charles's chest?
Excellent for staging events to end the old way and start anew. The Iran mess in my mind has one soul purpose to introduce a digital ID and currency system due to some all encompassing cyber crisis ( phooey )
Excellente analyse presque exhaustive. Il y manque le rôle joué par les descendants des patriarches Abraham, Isaac et Jacob également appelé Israël.
This is very interesting only on the American Revolution, Franklin, Washington and others were Free Masons and "British Spies". The colony side worked with the British side to work the war and it's outcome-the centralized (Federal) control we now suffer. It wasn't elite factions fighting, they were all the on the same side just like wars are now.
You’re making assertions as to statements made by myself in this article, which I in no form or fashion, implied or overt, have stated.
See my book Financialist Kill Chain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nC2pgcagyRk
Thank you Francis for this excellent referral, which eloquently describes the history and trajectory of our current global (western) financial system. As the future unfolds expect more conflict and disruption because now we have a third element involved. The end of growth due to EROEI in our hydrocarbon energy system. Our rulers already know this, kicked off by the Club of Rome in 1972. The response was predictable - financialisation to keep the ball rolling. It is ending now and CBDC is not a valid answer. https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/
I favour a third way: China's 'socialism with Chinese characteristics', or what I call 'Economic Democracy' https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/the-financial-jigsaw-part-2-64-the
"Labor for all, the opening of Credit for all; Leisure for all will be our bogie for the illusory creation of a new social class: the "Middle Class". Because once our objectives are reached, the "Class" in the middle, between the secular poor, and we the rich, we will definitely remove by cutting off all means of survival."
"Thus it will be possible to sharply increase the burden of the State by multiplying without any limit a body of intellectual public servants. Insured for years in advance of material security, they will be consequently perfect for executors of "Government Authority", in other words of "Our Power".
"Thus creating an impressive body of officials who will in itself (a Government within the Government), irrespective of the political party that is in power. This anonymous machine can serve us one day means of leverages when the moment comes to accelerate the economic collapse of the Nation States, because these will not be able to indefinitely sustain such mass salaries without having going into debt beyond their means."
The Toronto Protocols of the Canadian Freemasons. 1967